Vanity or Vice
Skip to content

base · layer weight 3

Full-coverage foundation

Maximum evening — highest cake exposure.

Layer weight · A film is one continuous layer sitting on the skin. Layer weight is the 0–3 opacity this object adds.

The catalog behind every score on this desk is editorial estimate on a published scale, not laboratory measurement. The scale says what each number is supposed to mean and names an object holding each level, so a figure can be argued with — but no figure here was measured, and none carries a citation. The scale is published in full.

Fit against your current edit

14

hold · 52 of 52

50 is neutral: nothing known for it, nothing known against it. Everything above and below is listed under the score.

  • Gives more opacity than the desk's default assumes. You have not set a coverage.
  • Carries the heaviest film-cost class on this desk.
Evidence · signed weights (they add up to 14)
  • +50 · Neutral start — Every product type starts here. Above 50 the model has more reasons for it; below, more reasons against.
  • -23 · Coverage match — Delivers 85 against an assumed appetite of 30.
  • -12 · Film cost — Every unit of modeled opacity load costs points.
  • +4 · Sebum behavior — How this texture is modeled against combination skin — the desk's assumption, not your answer.
  • -4 · Claim-literacy caution — Do not add opacity for a skincare claim whose concentration or finished-product evidence has not been established.
  • -1 · Scale and rounding — Each weight is rounded to a whole point, and the score is held inside 0–100. This row is the difference, so the column adds up to the score the rest of the desk shows. It is not a reason for or against the product.
Coverage delivery
85
Sebum behavior
1
Dry flex
-2
Minutes
6

Named formulas of this type

A type score above is about the type. It is not a measurement of any row below.

  • Jane Iredale · Glow Time Pro BB CreamCurrentLuminous· from name$58
Filed here, not verified as this type (3)

House-card examples and estimated prices. A contradiction means the name cannot honestly be this type. They are not product endorsements.

  • Suqqu · The Cream Foundation

    Estimated or house-card example. Price $78 is an estimate.

  • Wet n Wild · Photo Focus foundation only if sheered hard

    Estimated or house-card example. Price $14 is an estimate.

  • Make Up For Ever · HD Skin Foundation (sheer)

    Estimated or house-card example. Price $54 is an estimate.

Named examples · Jane Iredale Glow Time Pro BB (kept light) · 100% PURE Fruit Pigmented Cream Foundation

96 houses seed examples. Houses are positioning notes, not rankings.