Vanity or Vice
Skip to content

This is the desk's default answer, built from nothing you have told it. Whatever is saved in this browser replaces it in a moment — and if nothing is, every line below stays marked uncertain until you fill something in.

The fourth question

Why isn’t it working?

Name what you can see. The desk ranks the causes against your own profile, explains the mechanism behind each one, and gives you something to change — not something to buy. Where the likeliest cause is not a makeup problem, it will say so and point you at the desk that handles it.

One change at a time · A face changed in three places cannot be read. Make one change, give it two days, then come back.

What are you seeing?

In your log marks a failure you have actually recorded on the Wear desk, with the share of days and the hour it usually starts. Expected marks one your profile predicts — skin, climate, coverage and depth — which you may never have seen. Both are hints, and neither is a diagnosis; a thing that happened simply outranks a thing that might.

Pick a symptom above. Everything after that is two questions and a checklist.

How this diagnosis was reached

Figure · the diagnostic method

Three observations narrow the rules; the rules rank; the ranking is worth nothing until one test has separated the top two.A process diagram of the troubleshooting method. What you can see, when it appears and where on the face all feed a ranked list of plausible causes. The ranking leads to changing one variable. If the result improves, that interface becomes a stronger suspect; if nothing changes, the reader returns to the ranking and takes the next cause.one at a timenext causeOBSERVATIONWhat you can seePilling, creasing, flashback — thevisible event, not a theory.OBSERVATIONWhen it appearsOn application, within the hour, bymidday, by evening.OBSERVATIONWhere on the faceThe zone narrows the rule set morethan the symptom does.THE MODELCauses ranked byplausibilityA heuristic index from your profileand habits. Not a probability, andnever a reading of your face.THE MOVEChange one variableThe smallest reversible change thatseparates the top two causes.IT IMPROVEDThat interface is astronger suspectOne better day is evidence aboutyour day. It is not proof of auniversal rule.NOTHING CHANGEDWrong variableReturn and take the next cause, notanother product.
  • A step the desk always takes
  • A route out, taken only under a condition— dashed arrow
Three observations narrow the rules; the rules rank; the ranking is worth nothing until one test has separated the top two.The structure of this desk's own rule set, in troubleshoot.ts.
Watch the hand · 4 referencesThe corrections above are motions. Here they are, performed.

Chosen against the symptom you named and the causes the desk ranked. Technique references, not endorsements — a product named inside one is an archive example.