Vanity or Vice
Skip to content
Northern Lantern House Labs (opens in a new tab)
Makeup Intelligence

Score a profile · leave with a list

The Edit

0 of 29 fields personalised · risk 43 · skin-like 57 · 3 films · 8 min applying

The answer

Build performance minimal — 6 objects, 3 films, about 8 minutes.

Why

Sebum movement is doing the most model work (+7). The model raises wear pressure because sebum is in the profile and you do not want midday intervention.

Caveat

Education only — never a diagnosis, toxin score, safety ranking or calibrated probability. Verify the unit in your hand.

Next

Read the order, then open the kit, pick one house example, and take your list to the counter.

Pancake index 43 out of 100. Skin-like index 57 out of 100. These are heuristic model scores, not measured probabilities.

Your pancake index

43

Conditional · Balanced architecture

Skin-like index 57·model baseline 30

Products

6 / 6

Layers

3

Minutes applying

8

Tension

20

The connected path

From goal to reassessment

The score above is one piece. This connects it into a plan: what you are aiming for, the look the model builds toward, what each product is for, how to apply it, what the wear day looks like, and what to check afterwards.

Plan confidence

The desk does not have enough to say this with any confidence.

Uncertain

Goal

No specific goal is named. The plan is built from the default profile.

Look

Performance minimal: sheer coverage with an even finish. Tinted SPF or sport tint, stain colour, brows — sweat-honest.

Finish

a fluid base set with targeted powder.

Layering

6 products, 3 film layers — a moderate stack. 2 layering points to watch.

Balance

Three features are all emphasised. This is a full look — the risk is that nothing recedes, and the face reads as busy rather than composed.

Roles · 8

  • UV

    Suggested

    Performance sport tint · Whole face, as a continuous film

  • Colour correction

    Suggested

    Green redness corrector · The specific area of discolouration

  • Base

    Suggested

    Performance sport tint · Centre of the face outward — forehead, nose, cheeks, chin

  • Blush

    Suggested

    Long-wear cheek stain · Apples of the cheeks, blended toward the temple

  • Setting

    Suggested

    Pressed powder compact · Where movement or shine is expected — T-zone first

  • Brow

    Suggested

    Brow pencil · The brow, following its natural shape

  • Lip colour

    Suggested

    Tinted lip balm · The lip, inside the defined edge

  • Lip comfort

    Suggested

    Tinted lip balm · The lip surface

Wear day

Hr 0

The look is holding well

Hr 2

The look is holding well

Hr 4

The look is holding well

Hr 6

Base still present but thinning

Hr 8

Base still present but thinning

Hr 10

Base still present but thinning

Check afterwards

  • At the end of the day, look at the same zones in the same light you started in. What moved first, and where?
  • The model sees moderate wear pressure. A blot-first maintenance test is worth logging before changing the product.
  • You did not state how long the look needs to hold. Next time, set the hours — the wear forecast is scored against that number.

What the desk does not know

  • Undertone is not set, so colour recommendations are generic rather than matched.
  • Depth is not set, so shade and corrector guidance is not depth-specific.
  • Hours on the face is at the default, so the wear forecast is not scored for your day length.
  • No lighting context is set, so finish advice is not tested against the room you will be seen in.
  • No goals or outcomes are named, so the plan is built from the default profile rather than a stated aim.
Open the full Look Plan →

Contextual finding intelligence

The finding should tell you what to look at next.

Each panel ties the current desk context to a measurement procedure, one-variable test, explanatory plate, worked case and source trail. It is a decision aid, not a diagnosis.

audited baked fallback

catalog 2026-09-13-baked

Why this is here now

Separate broad tone evening from local contrast correction.

Coverage is still largely a model default, so start with the smallest film that proves what actually needs more opacity.

Selective coverage geometryTwo face diagrams compare all-over extra opacity with a thin veil plus small local correction zones.MORE EVERYWHERETHIN VEIL + LOCALGLOBAL OPACITYPLACEMENT
Explanatory plate, not a measurement. The measurement procedure is listed beside it.

Measure this

From normal viewing distance, mark which zones still create unwanted contrast after one thin base pass. Add product only to those zones and compare the total film needed.

Smallest useful test

Use one thin all-over pass, then add coverage only where contrast remains.

Prefills hypothesis, constants and the one variable to change. Saved locally only.